Improvements and all kinds of craft - just for morons. NPCs are completely dumb at any difficulty level. In some places I just wanted to feel sick. They directly want to feed you throughout the game. I am quite tolerant of sexual minorities and quite calmly look at the kissing men, but another important innovation in the game is worth mentioning as a separate point - a huge amount of gayness, lesbianism, all kinds of transgender, transsexual and trans-gay-lesbianism.
The game is rich in innovations, these are: meager locations, a complete lack of beautiful nature, completely idiotic and monotonous quests, a boring antagonist, and of course, a completely unnecessary supremo, which does not affect the gameplay in any way. You are a freshly baked insurgent who helps other insurgents in their insurgency. The plot of FC6 completely repeats the fourth part. The game is rich in innovations, these are: meager locations, a complete lack of beautiful nature, completely idiotic and monotonous quests, a boring antagonist, and of course, a completely unnecessary Compared to FC5, this game takes a huge step back. … ExpandĬompared to FC5, this game takes a huge step back. But at this point there's just too many of them for an enjoyable gaming experience.
Far cry 1 pc requirements update#
I might update my review when - and if - the performance is optimized and all of the glitches are fixed. Instead, it looks like a cheap, half-baked, rushed knock-off released to milk the franchise that millions will quickly snap up just because of the name. I don't see a decade of game development in this title. When running around the tropical landscapes does it really feel all that markedly different from even FarCry 3 launched in 2012? Not to me. Some bugs could be excused, of course, as games typically encounter hiccups upon release - but here we're not talking about a ground-breaking new game (like Cyberpunk) but a title that is a fourth installment in 10 years and has inherited much of the previous games' mechanics and even graphics. You're getting a terrible performance hit without any demonstrable benefits in visual quality - and it many ways the game actually looks worse, even when it runs at decent speeds. Out of the blue it drops to 10fps, adding to already poor first impressions. It also suffers from occasional lags and drops in performance, regardless of what's going on on the screen - and not even taxing the hardware, as my temps and fan speeds are all normal. FarCry 5, which clocked around 80 to 100fps and looked better than FC6 does. With 5600x, RTX 3080 and 64GB of RAM you can get 50-60fps in 4k - a drop of 50-60% vs.
The game looks worse than, actually, any of the past three FC games - but runs at lower FPS than they do. Not that poor resolution makes performance any better. (Although some people are reporting similar issues even without the HD pack). Was it a deliberate attempt to nerf the game on NV cards, as Ubisoft works with AMD? No idea, but it sure has made it look like it's 2005 again. What transpires is a whole mountain of bugs on high-end GPUs - like, lo and behold, Nvidia's RTX 3080, 3070 or 3060Ti. It also hasn't mentioned that if you don't own the suitable hardware the game will look like it belongs in a different age - and not one in the future but rather somewhere around mid-2000s. Nowhere before the release has Ubisoft mentioned it as a requirement, not even for 4k gaming in Ultra. The game demands 12GB of VRAM to handle HD textures.
It's a sign of the times that programmers simply don't give a damn about game optimization before the release and just dump it all on the hardware - causing glitches and subpar quality even on high-end PCs. Nowhere before the release has I'd like to say something about the game but at this quality upon release it's simply unplayable. I'd like to say something about the game but at this quality upon release it's simply unplayable.
0 kommentar(er)
